B-Klasse Süd
2025/2026
Vorläufige DWZ-Auswertung
| Name | Verein | DWZ alt | E | Punkte | We | Lstg. | Ø | DWZ neu | Δ | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Maier, Konrad | TSV Trostberg | 1518 | - | 67 | 20 | 2.0 / 5 | 1.349 | 1636 | 1717 | 1539 | - | 68 | 21 |
| 2. | Odak, Vlatko | TSV Trostberg | 1567 | - | 66 | 21 | 2.5 / 4 | 2.855 | 1390 | 1556 | - | 67 | -11 | |
| 3. | Kuttalek, Edmund | TSV Trostberg | 1513 | - | 23 | 20 | 2.5 / 5 | 2.956 | 1444 | 1444 | 1498 | - | 24 | -15 |
| 4. | Perzl, Michael | TSV Trostberg | 1633 | - | 78 | 22 | 4.0 / 4 | 3.642 | 1211 | 1644 | - | 79 | 11 | |
| 5. | Tag, Sergej | TSV Trostberg | 1462 | - | 32 | 20 | 4.0 / 6 | 4.439 | 1385 | 1226 | 1448 | - | 33 | -14 |
| 6. | Voggenthaler, Jörg | TSV Trostberg | 1412 | - | 71 | 19 | 0.0 / 2 | 1.370 | 1271 | 1360 | - | 72 | -52 | |
| 7. | Wolfmaier, Johannes | TSV Trostberg | 1166 | - | 27 | 17 | 2.5 / 6 | 2.338 | 1189 | 1260 | 1172 | - | 28 | 6 |
| 8. | Schneider, Martin | SF Rosenheim e.V. | 1440 | - | 38 | 19 | 0.0 / 1 | 0.291 | 1596 | 1428 | - | 39 | -12 | |
| 9. | Bernrieder, Christian | SF Rosenheim e.V. | 1305 | - | 8 | 18 | 0.0 / 6 | 0.720 | 992 | 1669 | 1281 | - | 9 | -24 |
| 10. | Schober, Roland | SF Rosenheim e.V. | 1344 | - | 8 | 18 | 0.5 / 3 | 0.979 | 1474 | 1326 | - | 9 | -18 | |
| 11. | Assmann, Arnd | SF Rosenheim e.V. | 1313 | - | 24 | 18 | 2.5 / 6 | 2.653 | 1290 | 1348 | 1308 | - | 25 | -5 |
| 12. | Weymayer, Günther | SF Rosenheim e.V. | 1255 | - | 19 | 18 | 1.0 / 5 | 1.466 | 1156 | 1432 | 1239 | - | 20 | -16 |
| 13. | Seufert, Peter | SF Rosenheim e.V. | 1093 | - | 16 | 19 | 0.0 / 4 | 0.605 | 1390 | 1072 | - | 17 | -21 | |
| 14. | Hanemann, Fredy | SF Rosenheim e.V. | 1202 | - | 105 | 18 | 2.0 / 4 | 2.137 | 1171 | 1197 | - | 106 | -5 | |
| 15. | Mandelkau, Norbert | SF Rosenheim e.V. | 1138 | - | 51 | 19 | 0.0 / 2 | 0.663 | 1264 | 1113 | - | 52 | -25 | |
| 16. | Rossa, Bogdan | SF Rosenheim e.V. | 1163 | - | 21 | 18 | 1.5 / 3 | 1.564 | 1143 | 1161 | - | 22 | -2 | |
| 17. | Frese, Daniel | SG Traunstein/Traunreut e.V. | 1918 | - | 124 | 29 | 2.5 / 3 | 2.604 | 1531 | 1915 | - | 125 | -3 | |
| 18. | Krause, Günther | SG Traunstein/Traunreut e.V. | 1666 | - | 63 | 23 | 1.0 / 1 | 0.592 | 1600 | 1680 | - | 64 | 14 | |
| 19. | Steffl, Herbert | SG Traunstein/Traunreut e.V. | 1597 | - | 115 | 22 | 0.5 / 1 | 0.574 | 1544 | 1594 | - | 116 | -3 | |
| 20. | Fehsenfeld, Frauke | SG Traunstein/Traunreut e.V. | 1457 | - | 40 | 20 | 0.0 / 1 | 0.437 | 1502 | 1440 | - | 41 | -17 | |
| 21. | Copitzky, Thomas | SG Traunstein/Traunreut e.V. | 1376 | - | 33 | 19 | 0.5 / 1 | 0.327 | 1503 | 1383 | - | 34 | 7 | |
| 22. | Grossmann, Simon | SG Traunstein/Traunreut e.V. | 1241 | - | 7 | 17 | 2.5 / 5 | 1.088 | 1476 | 1474 | 1292 | - | 8 | 51 |
| 23. | Gruber, Christian | SG Traunstein/Traunreut e.V. | 1309 | - | 2 | 8 | 1.5 / 4 | 1.552 | 1401 | 1306 | - | 3 | -3 | |
| 24. | Kolb, Peter | SG Traunstein/Traunreut e.V. | 1204 | - | 1 | 18 | 0.0 / 1 | 0.010 | 1867 | 1204 | - | 2 | 0 | |
| 25. | Kühler, Sonja | SG Traunstein/Traunreut e.V. | 933 | - | 4 | 26 | 0.0 / 5 | 0.749 | 633 | 1310 | 914 | - | 5 | -19 |
| 26. | Seibold, Günther | SG Traunstein/Traunreut e.V. | 1053 | - | 23 | 20 | 0.0 / 3 | 0.511 | 1370 | 1035 | - | 24 | -18 | |
| 27. | Lähn, Peter | SG Traunstein/Traunreut e.V. | 1244 | - | 1 | 18 | 1.0 / 3 | 1.605 | 1219 | 1221 | - | 2 | -23 | |
| 28. | Krause, Marianne | SK Freilassing | 1572 | - | 103 | 21 | 3.5 / 6 | 3.831 | 1527 | 1457 | 1562 | - | 104 | -10 |
| 29. | Bezruchko, Artem | SK Freilassing | 1416 | - | 16 | 6 | 2.0 / 3 | 1.001 | 1538 | 1505 | - | 17 | 89 | |
| 30. | Scheuerl, Matthias | SK Freilassing | 1405 | - | 25 | 19 | 3.5 / 4 | 2.114 | 1384 | 1453 | - | 26 | 48 | |
| 31. | Stadler, Maria | SK Freilassing | 966 | - | 29 | 16 | 1.0 / 6 | 0.801 | 1023 | 1371 | 973 | - | 30 | 7 |
| 32. | Chen, Yijiang | SK Freilassing | 1178 | - | 8 | 5 | 2.5 / 4 | 1.421 | 1299 | 1274 | - | 9 | 96 | |
| 33. | Zimmermann, Sebastian | SK Freilassing | 1041 | - | 5 | 16 | 1.0 / 5 | 0.672 | 1121 | 1375 | 1053 | - | 6 | 12 |
| 34. | Sadykov, Kamran | SK Freilassing | 922 | - | 4 | 5 | 1.5 / 3 | 0.555 | 1212 | 1017 | - | 5 | 95 | |
| 35. | Toska, Taulant | SK Freilassing | 1436 | - | 4 | 19 | 2.0 / 3 | 2.376 | 1204 | 1422 | - | 5 | -14 | |
| 36. | Hopp, Günter | SU Hirschbichl | 1771 | - | 76 | 25 | 2.0 / 4 | 2.833 | 1576 | 1748 | - | 77 | -23 | |
| 37. | Huber, Christian | SU Hirschbichl | 1505 | - | 58 | 20 | 0.5 / 3 | 1.361 | 1545 | 1475 | - | 59 | -30 | |
| 38. | Kanz, Johannes | SU Hirschbichl | 1473 | - | 117 | 20 | 2.5 / 5 | 3.143 | 1357 | 1344 | 1452 | - | 118 | -21 |
| 39. | Engelhardt, Sebastian | SU Hirschbichl | 1386 | - | 27 | 19 | 1.5 / 4 | 2.003 | 1383 | 1369 | - | 28 | -17 | |
| 40. | Singer, Max | SU Hirschbichl | 1317 | - | 74 | 18 | 0.0 / 2 | 0.719 | 1444 | 1288 | - | 75 | -29 | |
| 41. | Schlüßlhuber, Johannes | SU Hirschbichl | 1325 | - | 22 | 18 | 2.5 / 3 | 1.894 | 1201 | 1348 | - | 23 | 23 | |
| 42. | Haslbeck, Christoph | SU Hirschbichl | 1373 | - | 15 | 19 | 2.5 / 4 | 2.029 | 1355 | 1389 | - | 16 | 16 | |
| 43. | Schmidtke, Jürgen | SU Hirschbichl | 1341 | - | 100 | 18 | 3.5 / 5 | 2.796 | 1463 | 1289 | 1365 | - | 101 | 24 |
| 44. | Artner, Christoph | SU Hirschbichl | 1056 | - | 6 | 20 | 0.0 / 3 | 1.036 | 1194 | 1020 | - | 7 | -36 | |
| 45. | Wolf, Reinhard | SU Hirschbichl | 1011 | - | 57 | 22 | 0.0 / 2 | 0.541 | 1184 | 993 | - | 58 | -18 | |
| 46. | Jüstel, Helmut | SF Bad Reichenhall | 1824 | - | 66 | 26 | 2.0 / 2 | 1.730 | 1511 | 1832 | - | 67 | 8 | |
| 47. | Rennicke, Uwe | SF Bad Reichenhall | 1600 | - | 54 | 22 | 2.0 / 4 | 2.479 | 1502 | 1585 | - | 55 | -15 | |
| 48. | Reymann, Gerhard | SF Bad Reichenhall | 1586 | - | 36 | 21 | 1.0 / 2 | 1.122 | 1542 | 1582 | - | 37 | -4 | |
| 49. | Fernandez, Thomas | SF Bad Reichenhall | 1533 | - | 50 | 21 | 0.5 / 1 | 0.769 | 1325 | 1523 | - | 51 | -10 | |
| 50. | Hagenauer, Wilhelm | SF Bad Reichenhall | 1544 | - | 113 | 21 | 3.5 / 6 | 3.635 | 1527 | 1464 | 1540 | - | 114 | -4 |
| 51. | Goldbrunner, Michael | SF Bad Reichenhall | 1483 | - | 63 | 20 | 2.0 / 4 | 2.769 | 1296 | 1457 | - | 64 | -26 | |
| 52. | Kunert, Helmut | SF Bad Reichenhall | 1502 | - | 66 | 20 | 2.0 / 3 | 1.936 | 1379 | 1504 | - | 67 | 2 | |
| 53. | Melchart, Siegfried | SF Bad Reichenhall | 1503 | - | 114 | 20 | 4.0 / 5 | 3.777 | 1553 | 1273 | 1510 | - | 115 | 7 |
| 54. | Scheuerl, Thomas, Dr. | SF Bad Reichenhall | 1478 | - | 40 | 20 | 1.0 / 1 | 0.645 | 1373 | 1492 | - | 41 | 14 | |
| 55. | Simon, Roman | SF Bad Reichenhall | 1417 | - | 45 | 19 | 5.0 / 5 | 4.241 | 1780 | 1103 | 1442 | - | 46 | 25 |
| 56. | Jehn, Detlef | SF Bad Reichenhall | 1300 | - | 40 | 18 | 1.0 / 1 | 0.636 | 1202 | 1315 | - | 41 | 15 | |
| 57. | Bechtold, Rainer | SK Mangfalltal | 1867 | - | 35 | 27 | 1.0 / 1 | 0.990 | 1204 | 1867 | - | 36 | 0 | |
| 58. | Holst, Daniel | SK Mangfalltal | 1596 | - | 41 | 21 | 2.0 / 2 | 1.699 | 1186 | 1606 | - | 42 | 10 | |
| 59. | Rummer, Evi | SK Mangfalltal | 1592 | - | 75 | 21 | 2.0 / 2 | 1.539 | 1298 | 1608 | - | 76 | 16 | |
| 60. | Hering, Frank | SK Mangfalltal | 1590 | - | 56 | 21 | 2.0 / 2 | 1.368 | 1438 | 1612 | - | 57 | 22 | |
| 61. | Meixner, Manfred | SK Mangfalltal | 1566 | - | 26 | 21 | 1.5 / 2 | 0.849 | 1627 | 1589 | - | 27 | 23 | |
| 62. | Vorwerk, Peter | SK Mangfalltal | 1503 | - | 66 | 20 | 3.0 / 5 | 2.892 | 1519 | 1444 | 1506 | - | 67 | 3 |
| 63. | Afeldt, Stefan | SK Mangfalltal | 1530 | - | 34 | 20 | 3.0 / 4 | 2.592 | 1414 | 1544 | - | 35 | 14 | |
| 64. | Verney, Loz | SK Mangfalltal | 1373 | - | 3 | 15 | 2.0 / 5 | 2.525 | 1289 | 1362 | 1352 | - | 4 | -21 |
| 65. | Giss, Heinrich | SK Mangfalltal | 1395 | - | 15 | 19 | 1.0 / 1 | 0.935 | 966 | 1398 | - | 16 | 3 | |
| 66. | Metzger, Zslot | SK Mangfalltal | 1337 | - | 12 | 18 | 2.0 / 2 | 1.346 | 1191 | 1363 | - | 13 | 26 | |
| 67. | Klatt, Steffen | SK Mangfalltal | 1203 | - | 4 | 17 | 4.0 / 5 | 2.324 | 1512 | 1233 | 1264 | - | 5 | 61 |
Das ist nur eine vorläufige DWZ-Auswertung! Sie kann und soll nicht die offizielle Auswertung der Wertungsreferenten ersetzen. Obwohl diese Auswertung nach den Berechnungsbestimmungen der Wertungsordnung umgesetzt wurde, kann natürlich nicht garantiert werden, dass sie absolut korrekt ist. Insbesondere werden keine Restpartien berücksichtigt.