Einsatzstatistik - Schwabenliga 2 Süd
In der Einsatzstatistik sind die Ergebnisse er einzelnen Spieler zu sehen. Bewegt man den Mauszeiger auf ein Ergebnis, erscheinen in einem sog. "Tooltip" weitere Informationen (Brett, Gegnerische Mannschaft und Gegner). Ergebnisse in grauer Schrift wurden in einer anderen Liga erziehlt.
SC Dietmannsried | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWZ | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ∑ | Einsätze | % | ||
1 | Martin, Paul | 1894 | ½ | ½ | 0 | ½ | ½ | 0 | 2.0 | 6 | 33 % | |
2 | Dekov, Bozhidar | 1796 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | ½ | ½ | 1 | 4.0 | 7 | 57 % |
3 | Martin, Heinz | 1819 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ½ | + | + | 5.5 | 7 | 79 % |
4 | Natterer, Winfried | 1668 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ½ | 0 | 1 | 2.5 | 7 | 36 % |
5 | Stiefenhofer, Andreas | 1615 | 0 | 0 | ½ | 0 | 1 | ½ | 2.0 | 6 | 33 % | |
6 | Lenzenhuber, Sebastian | 1554 | - | |||||||||
7 | Sonnberger, Julian | 1524 | 1 | 0 | ½ | ½ | 2.0 | 4 | 50 % | |||
8 | Czitron, Gerhard | 1540 | ½ | 0 | 0 | ½ | ½ | 1.5 | 5 | 30 % | ||
9 | Marton, Andre | 1549 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0 % | ||||||
10 | Brinkmann, Jürgen | 1554 | ||||||||||
11 | Krafft, Alexander | 1522 | ||||||||||
12 | Stiefenhofer, Bernd | 1484 | ||||||||||
13 | Mayer, Thomas | 1299 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ½ | 0.5 | 4 | 12 % | |||
14 | Illg, Johann | 1331 | ||||||||||
15 | Sonnberger, Bernd | 1287 | ||||||||||
16 | Liebsch, Manfred | 1419 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 | 3 | 33 % | ||||
17 | Sichler, Stephan | 1363 | 0 | 0 | ½ | 0.5 | 3 | 17 % | ||||
18 | Buchka, Josef | 1289 | ½ | 0 | 0.5 | 2 | 25 % | |||||
19 | Stiegeler, Markus | 1142 | ||||||||||
20 | Fruijtier, Leo | 716 | ||||||||||
SC 1892 Kaufbeuren | ||||||||||||
DWZ | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ∑ | Einsätze | % | ||
1 | Fischer, Hans | 2074 | 1 | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | 4.0 | 7 | 57 % |
2 | Schreiber, Roland | 1920 | 1 | 1 | 0 | ½ | ½ | ½ | 3.5 | 6 | 58 % | |
3 | Orf, Markus | 1912 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | 5.0 | 7 | 71 % |
4 | Huber, Stefan | 1835 | ½ | ½ | 1 | ½ | 2.5 | 4 | 62 % | |||
5 | Gebhard, Eduard | 1853 | ½ | ½ | ½ | 1 | ½ | 1 | ½ | 4.5 | 7 | 64 % |
6 | Herold, Gunther | 1881 | ½ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ½ | 6.0 | 7 | 86 % |
7 | Gang, Ralf | 1916 | ||||||||||
8 | Folly, Gerhard | 1922 | ||||||||||
9 | Gebhard, Hans | 1768 | 1 | 1 | ½ | 1 | 1 | 1 | ½ | 6.0 | 7 | 86 % |
10 | Reiners, Michael | 1695 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3.0 | 3 | 100 % | ||||
11 | Fischer, Janine | 1626 | ||||||||||
12 | Rajkovic, Slobodan | 1667 | 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 100 % | ||||||
13 | Melzer, Christoph | 1594 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | ½ | 4.5 | 6 | 75 % | |
14 | Schmiderer, Erwin | 1553 | ½ | 0.5 | 1 | 50 % | ||||||
15 | Fischer, Peter | 1627 | ||||||||||
16 | Noe, Siegbert | 1545 | ||||||||||
17 | Alahjoussef, Abdullah | 1480 | ||||||||||
18 | Gruber, Alwin | 1286 | ||||||||||
19 | Gebuhr, Paul | |||||||||||
SC Königsbrunn | ||||||||||||
DWZ | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ∑ | Einsätze | % | ||
1 | Kottmair, Toni | 2091 | 1 | ½ | ½ | ½ | 1 | ½ | ½ | 4.5 | 7 | 64 % |
2 | Kolb, Wolfgang | 1988 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ½ | 1 | 1 | ½ | 6.0 | 7 | 86 % |
3 | Herd, Randolph | 1809 | 0 | 1 | 1.0 | 2 | 50 % | |||||
4 | Scherer, Stefan | 2060 | ||||||||||
5 | Stein, Johann | 1853 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4.0 | 5 | 80 % | ||
6 | Paul, Eric | 1768 | ||||||||||
7 | Koppmann, Peter | 1836 | ½ | 0 | ½ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4.0 | 6 | 67 % | |
8 | Dietl, Robert | 1834 | ||||||||||
9 | Tschiedel, Erwin | 1668 | 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 100 % | ||||||
10 | Scholz, Peter | 1584 | ½ | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2.5 | 5 | 50 % | ||
11 | Goll, Peter | 1672 | 1 | 1 | ½ | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4.5 | 6 | 75 % | |
12 | Avdija, Agim | 1498 | 1 | 0 | ½ | 1.5 | 3 | 50 % | ||||
13 | Strehle, Reiner | 1499 | ½ | 1 | ½ | 2.0 | 3 | 67 % | ||||
14 | Glaab, Nikolai | 1715 | 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 100 % | ||||||
15 | Wölfle, Fabian | 1544 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ½ | 1 | - | 1.5 | 6 | 25 % | |
16 | Lutolli, Faik | 1499 | 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 100 % | ||||||
17 | Rether, Adolf | 1325 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0 % | ||||||
18 | Steiner, Laurin | 1271 | 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 100 % | ||||||
19 | Matthes, Carl-Luis | 1118 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0 % | ||||||
20 | Weigl, Marlon | 1188 | ||||||||||
SF Buchenberg | ||||||||||||
DWZ | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ∑ | Einsätze | % | ||
1 | Garber, Thomas | 2191 | 1 | ½ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ½ | 6.0 | 7 | 86 % |
2 | Braeu, Wolfgang | 1803 | ||||||||||
3 | Hahmann, Christian | 1818 | 1 | 0 | ½ | ½ | 0 | 1 | ½ | 3.5 | 7 | 50 % |
4 | Barthels, Rainer | 1810 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | ½ | ½ | 4.0 | 6 | 67 % | |
5 | Hermann, Volker | 1746 | 1 | ½ | + | ½ | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5.0 | 7 | 71 % |
6 | Zeumer, Falk | 1741 | + | ½ | 0 | ½ | ½ | 0 | 0 | 2.5 | 7 | 36 % |
7 | Müller, Rolf | 1521 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 3 | 0 % | ||||
8 | Grimm, Wolfgang | 1527 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ½ | ½ | 2.0 | 5 | 40 % | ||
9 | Garber, Janek | 1562 | ½ | 0 | 1 | ½ | ½ | 1 | 0 | 3.5 | 7 | 50 % |
10 | Maier, Max | 1577 | 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 100 % | ||||||
11 | Kimmelmann, Alfons | 1362 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 2 | 0 % | |||||
12 | Becker, Arno | 1479 | ||||||||||
13 | Paul, Sven-Joachim | 1280 | ||||||||||
14 | Epple, Gabriel | 1461 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0 % | ||||||
15 | Schöll, Tobias | 1831 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3.0 | 3 | 100 % | ||||
16 | Hesse, Thomas | 968 | ||||||||||
17 | Baiz, Gabriel | 1123 | ||||||||||
18 | Grimm, Susanne | 907 | ||||||||||
19 | Dannenmann, Sammy | 865 | ||||||||||
20 | Rox, Levi | |||||||||||
SK Marktoberdorf II | ||||||||||||
DWZ | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ∑ | Einsätze | % | ||
1 | Jenul, Reinhold | 2047 | ½ | 1 | ½ | 1 | ½ | 3.5 | 5 | 70 % | ||
2 | Neumeier, Lukas | 1848 | 1 | 0 | 1.0 | 2 | 50 % | |||||
3 | Kollmann, Robert | 1900 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ½ | 1.5 | 4 | 38 % | |||
4 | Hipp, Hermann | 1890 | 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 100 % | ||||||
5 | Menzinger, Peter, Dr. | 1801 | ½ | 1 | 1 | ½ | ½ | 3.5 | 5 | 70 % | ||
6 | Müller, Wolfgang | 1736 | 1 | ½ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ½ | 2.0 | 7 | 29 % |
7 | Klug, Tobias, Dr. | 1618 | 0 | ½ | ½ | 0 | ½ | 0 | ½ | 2.0 | 7 | 29 % |
8 | Neumann, Bernd, Dr. | 1706 | ½ | 1 | ½ | 1 | ½ | 1 | ½ | 5.0 | 7 | 71 % |
9 | Brugger, Hans | 1981 | ||||||||||
10 | Bräu, Ludwig | 1676 | 1 | 1 | ½ | 2.5 | 3 | 83 % | ||||
11 | Eiband, Karl | 1685 | 1 | 1 | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | 4.0 | 6 | 67 % | |
12 | Steger, Franz | 1606 | ||||||||||
13 | Fischer, Johann | 1651 | ½ | 0.5 | 1 | 50 % | ||||||
14 | Hilscher, Maximilian, Dr. | 1608 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0 % | ||||||
15 | Hörmann, Wilhelm | 1529 | 1 | ½ | 1.5 | 2 | 75 % | |||||
16 | Gepting, Konrad | 1392 | ||||||||||
17 | Bräu, Emmi | 1216 | ||||||||||
18 | Wilde, Martin | 1464 | ||||||||||
19 | Brunauer, Simon | 1499 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ½ | 1.5 | 5 | 30 % | ||
20 | Kneisel, Arne | 1109 | ||||||||||
SC Obergünzburg | ||||||||||||
DWZ | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ∑ | Einsätze | % | ||
1 | Taufratshofer, Martin | 1846 | ½ | 0 | ½ | ½ | 0 | 0 | + | 2.5 | 7 | 36 % |
2 | Knischka, Walter | 1690 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ½ | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 6 | 8 % | |
3 | Schwarzer, Klaus | 1766 | + | 1.0 | 1 | 100 % | ||||||
4 | Schwendinger, Peter | 1750 | 1 | ½ | 0 | ½ | 0 | ½ | ½ | 3.0 | 7 | 43 % |
5 | Lecheler, Rudolf | 1667 | ½ | ½ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ½ | 1.5 | 7 | 21 % |
6 | Herold, Elias | 1612 | 0 | ½ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2.5 | 6 | 42 % | |
7 | Mayer, Reinhard | 1639 | 1 | ½ | ½ | 0 | 1 | ½ | 3.5 | 6 | 58 % | |
8 | Oberhofer, Moritz | 1536 | ½ | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.5 | 7 | 36 % |
9 | Weiß, Hans | 1695 | 0 | 1 | 1.0 | 2 | 50 % | |||||
10 | Hilger, Philip | 1484 | 1 | 0 | ½ | 1.5 | 3 | 50 % | ||||
11 | Osterrieder, Jürgen | 1572 | 1 | 0 | 1.0 | 2 | 50 % | |||||
12 | Weiss, Hermann | 1454 | ||||||||||
13 | Herold, Florian | 1480 | ½ | 0.5 | 1 | 50 % | ||||||
14 | Walser, Erwin | 1336 | 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 100 % | ||||||
15 | Oberhofer, Christian | 1424 | ||||||||||
16 | Osterrieder, Rudolf | 1271 | ||||||||||
17 | Dausch, Georg | 1284 | ||||||||||
18 | Schneider, Christian | 1205 | ||||||||||
19 | Osterrieder, Daniel | 1165 | ||||||||||
SK Buchloe | ||||||||||||
DWZ | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ∑ | Einsätze | % | ||
1 | Capris, Marius | 2028 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 1 | 0 % | |||||
2 | Keller, Alexander | 1942 | 0 | 1 | ½ | 1 | 2.5 | 4 | 62 % | |||
3 | Kugelmann, Joachim | 1899 | - | |||||||||
4 | Kutter, Andreas | 1746 | 0 | 0 | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | 2.0 | 6 | 33 % | |
5 | Fuckert, Bernhard | 1691 | - | |||||||||
6 | Pracht, Alexandra | 1649 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ½ | 0 | 1 | ½ | 2.0 | 7 | 29 % |
7 | Hacklinger, Rainer | 1661 | 0 | - | 1 | 0 | 1.0 | 3 | 33 % | |||
8 | Hacklinger, Dilan | 1538 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0 % | ||||||
9 | Bogner, Simon | 1753 | ½ | ½ | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4.0 | 7 | 57 % |
10 | Bail, Leonhard | 1660 | ½ | ½ | 1 | 0 | ½ | ½ | 3.0 | 6 | 50 % | |
11 | Lenuweit, Jörg | 1638 | ||||||||||
12 | Weisbrod, Jörg | 1576 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ½ | 2.5 | 6 | 42 % | |
13 | Stolzenwald, Karl-Heinz | 1507 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ½ | ½ | 2.0 | 6 | 33 % | |
14 | Marx, Simon | 1469 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 3 | 0 % | ||||
15 | Kugelmann, Gerhard | 1300 | ||||||||||
16 | Bail, Rudolf | 1259 | ||||||||||
17 | Protschka, Gregor | 1275 | ||||||||||
18 | Protschka, Robert | |||||||||||
19 | Hacklinger, Leon | 1185 | 0 | ½ | 0.5 | 2 | 25 % | |||||
TSV 1882 Landsberg | ||||||||||||
DWZ | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ∑ | Einsätze | % | ||
1 | Melber, Thomas | 1884 | 0 | 1 | ½ | 0 | 0 | ½ | 1 | 3.0 | 7 | 43 % |
2 | Golovnya, Aleksandr | 1720 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ½ | 1 | 0 | 2.5 | 6 | 42 % | |
3 | Scholze, Leon | 1813 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ½ | 2.5 | 5 | 50 % | ||
4 | Granvogl, Heinz, Dr. | 1748 | ½ | ½ | 0 | - | 1.0 | 3 | 33 % | |||
5 | Maier, Josef | 1712 | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | 0 | 3.0 | 7 | 43 % |
6 | Jehle, Manfred | 1741 | ½ | 1 | 1 | 2.5 | 3 | 83 % | ||||
7 | Wolfs, Patrick | 1640 | 0 | ½ | ½ | 1.0 | 3 | 33 % | ||||
8 | Johannssen, Paul | 1253 | ||||||||||
9 | Wieser, Michael | 1720 | ||||||||||
10 | Tinkl, Hubert | 1549 | 1 | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | 0 | 3.0 | 6 | 50 % | |
11 | Steinberger, Robert | 1488 | 1 | ½ | 0 | 1.5 | 3 | 50 % | ||||
12 | Schmid, Andreas | 1318 | ||||||||||
13 | Bungert, Rene | 1334 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ½ | 0.5 | 4 | 12 % | |||
14 | Welfonder, Robert | 1182 | ||||||||||
15 | Sicker, Franz | 1422 | 0 | 0 | ½ | 0.5 | 3 | 17 % | ||||
16 | Krueger, Peter | 1501 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2.0 | 3 | 67 % | ||||
17 | Boeck, Armin | 1089 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0 % | ||||||
18 | Hartl, Marcus | 949 | ½ | 0.5 | 1 | 50 % | ||||||
19 | Mayer, Manuel | 1601 |